![]() Compare these results with the results returned by the list function.| makeresults count=1000 | streamstats count AS rowNumber | stats values(rowNumber) AS numbers The results are returned in lexicographical order. Add the stats command with the values function to the search.Use the makeresults and streamstats commands to generate a set of results that are simply timestamps and a count of the results, which are used as row numbers.To illustrate what the values function does, let's start by generating a few simple results. Other symbols are sorted before or after letters. Some symbols are sorted before numeric values. Uppercase letters are sorted before lowercase letters.For example, the numbers 10, 9, 70, 100 are sorted lexicographically as 10, 100, 70, 9. Numbers are sorted based on the first digit. In Splunk software, this is almost always UTF-8 encoding, which is a superset of ASCII. Lexicographical order sorts items based on the values used to encode the items in computer memory. You specify the limit in the stanza using the maxvalues setting. Users with the appropriate permissions can specify a limit in the nf file. By default there is no limit to the number of values returned.You can use the values(X) function with the chart, stats, timechart, and tstats commands. The order of the values is lexicographical. The values function returns a list of the distinct values in a field as a multivalue entry. Compare this result with the results returned by the values function.There are no alternating row background colors. | makeresults count=1000 | streamstats count AS rowNumber | stats list(rowNumber) AS numbers The numbers are returned in ascending order in a single, multivalue result. Add the stats command with the list function to the search.Notice that each result appears on a separate row. The results appear on the Statistics tab and look something like this: | makeresults count=1000 | streamstats count AS rowNumber Use the makeresults and streamstats commands to generate a set of results that are simply timestamps and a count of the results which are used as row numbers.To illustrate what the list function does, let's start by generating a few simple results. This function processes field values as strings.If more than 100 values are in a field, only the first 100 are returned. ) Required arguments stats-agg-term Syntax: ( ) AS Description: A statistical aggregation function. stats partitions allnum delim ( .You can use this function with the chart, stats, and timechart commands. BY field-list Complete: Required syntax is in bold. The order of the values reflects the order of the events. The list function returns a multivalue entry from the values in a field. above it will create up to two rows of Procedure_Name values for each missing set.Multivalue stats and chart functions list() Description Then you can do whatever aggregation you need, i.e. In the above, the stats command will 'join' the lookup data and the indexed data and add the lookup to each procedure_name row, then the missing evaluation can be done after that using mvfind(). Your final stats statement does not have any split by clause, so at best you would get a single row with a set of lookup values, a set of original values and one or two words indicating match or no match with no tie up between the matching and non matching lines. | stats values(Procedure_Name) as Procedure_Name by Missing | eval Missing=if(isnull(mvfind(Lookup_Vals,Procedure_Name)), 1,0) ![]() | stats sum(count) as total, values(Lookup_procedures) as Lookup_Vals by Procedure_Name ![]() I've also true using mvjoin(Originals, ",") command on the Originals but that doesn't seem to help will not exist during the stats statement |search index here | stats sum(count) as total, List(Lookup_procedures) as Lookup_Vals, Values(Procedure_Name) as Originals, Values(eval(if(IN(Lookup_procedures,Originals),"Match","No Match"))) as Missing | eval Procedure_Name=coalesce(Process_Name, Procedure_Name) | fields Procedure_Name,Process_Name,Activity_Code, UpdatedDate The if statement resolves to false every time even though I know the lists are mostly the same. I've also tried using "List(eval(if(IN(Lookup_procedures,Originals),"Match","No Match"))) as Missing" but that doesn't seem to work either. I've tried using match command but that just tells me if the lists are the same or not. I want a new list that is made up of values in the Lookup_Vals list but NOT in the Originals list. These are called Lookup_Vals(from lookup table's Lookup_procedures field) and Originals(from splunk search Procedure_Name field). I have created two lists from stats-list and stats-values.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |